Navigating the complex media landscape surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is challenging due to the control exerted by the Israeli military. Within this context, one recurring theme that requires closer examination is the concept of “dual” alignment. By delving deeper into these claims, we can strive to gain a clearer understanding of the truth.
Don’t think you’re going to see the world attack Israel because of war crimes Israel is unapologetically committing.
And here’s why it’s important to understand why most people are not talking about it. The formation of Hamas as an organization can be traced back to the Israeli occupation and the oppressive conditions imposed on Palestinians in the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza Strip. Hamas emerged in 1987, it is important to note that its existence is tied directly to the opposition against Israeli policies. As a result, Hamas expressed an objective of destroying Israel.
Hamas emerged in response to the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Although it was created in 1987, it is crucial to recognize that its formation was driven by Palestinian grievances arising from the oppressive conditions they faced. Hamas’s objectives go beyond seeking Israel’s destruction; they also aim to address these grievances and advocate for Palestinian self-determination.
Hamas arose in response to the hardships endured by the Palestinian people due to Israeli oppression. Their primary objective is to combat this oppression and strive for the establishment of a sovereign Palestinian state within what is commonly referred to as Israel’s territory.
Palestine and Hamas are not arbitrary terms; they carry profound significance in the ongoing struggle for justice and statehood.
Contrary to popular belief, Hamas is not internationally recognized as a terrorist group. In fact, it is considered a legitimate political party in Gaza and holds governing power there. It’s crucial to highlight that their governance in Gaza is not authoritarian; they were democratically elected into power through legitimate legislative means.
It is worth noting that there is a notable portion of Palestinians and Muslims within Israel who show support for Hamas. While the American perspective labels Hamas as a terrorist organization, the United Nations does not categorize them as such.
The UN recognizes Hamas as a political organization and acknowledges their impact on politics. Hence, when the president refers to Hamas as a terrorist group, it reflects a distinctly American viewpoint.
This “view” is why people often fail to recognize that Hamas emerged as a response to Israel’s aggression against Palestinians. It is important to maintain objectivity when examining historical events rather than solely focusing on current occurrences.
The US’s approach to news from the conflict is causing frustration. They unquestioningly adopt whatever Israel asserts, even when evidence later proves it to be exaggerated or false. This one-sided stance undermines objective reporting and hinders a fair understanding of the situation.
The dual approach to violence displayed in this situation is stunning. The Hamas militants, who launched an attack on Israel on Oct. 7, resulted in the loss of over 1, 000 civilian lives and 300 Israeli soldiers. US officials have joined Israel in expressing their outrage at the devastating “carnage.”
The discrepancy is evident when American officials downplay the alarming death toll caused by Israel’s bombardment of Gaza. It is disheartening to witness the destruction of residential buildings, hospitals, mosques, and churches, leading to the tragic loss of over 15, 000 Palestinian lives. The urgency for a ceasefire grows as long as the US continues to obstruct calls for peace.
President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s decision to reject calls for a ceasefire highlights a concerning disparity in America’s approach. While they prioritize the safety of Israeli lives, there appears to be a lack of equal concern for Palestinian lives.
This dual policy raises important questions about the humanitarian considerations at play in the conflict.
Biden and Blinken have acknowledged the importance of preventing civilian casualties without explicitly addressing the ongoing violence against Palestinians by Israel. This omission raises questions about their stance on the matter.
The Biden administration’s efforts to evacuate Americans from Israel demonstrate a dual policy approach. In addition, they have expedited Tel Aviv’s entry into the Visa Waiver Program, indicating their commitment to facilitating travel between the US and Israel.
But, the Biden administration is not evacuating Americans who are in Gaza. The situation at the Rafah crossing is dire, with many American citizens stranded and unable to cross. The US has not taken any action to assist them.
In the same vein as the Afghanistan withdrawal, Biden is leaving US citizens in harm’s way.
The president of the United States has committed $100,000,000 to Palestine for humanitarian aid. At the same time, he is calling on the US Congress to allocate $100,000,000,000 of taxpayer money to fund Israel, Ukraine, and Taiwan. There are significant financial commitments being made.
Do you think that humanitarian aid will get to those that are struggling and suffering within Palestine? And then what are your thoughts on the $100,000,000, for these three front wars that we’re potentially opening?
The president’s request for Hamas not to interfere with humanitarian aid is impossible because Hamas is the governing body in Gaza.
It’s impossible to give humanitarian aid to Gaza without Hamas being involved. The idea that he’s saying that at all, the fact that he’s putting that condition on it at all is simply Joe Biden provoking an expected response because he already knows that Israel and the United States will be able to say in the future that Hamas interfered with humanitarian aid.
The actions being taken by Joe Biden or his advisors indicate a clear intention to escalate the conflict against Hamas and the Palestinians. The outcome of this strategy is likely to be as expected, reinforcing the existing tensions.
There are several reasons why Hamas, as well as Iran, supported the initial attacks on Israel. We are witnessing a real-time game of provocation, where Iran aimed to provoke Israel in order to create a humanitarian crisis, and unfortunately, they succeeded.They succeeded in doing that, which led to the shutdown of the Israeli-Saudi Arabian ties that were being built, right?
Israel was getting closer to the Sunni Muslim world, making significant advances in UAE and Saudi Arabia. The groundbreaking peace agreements in Bahrain were changing the dynamics in the Middle East. However, Iran sought to disrupt these developments. It is believed that they funded the attack launched by Hamas into Israel, resulting in chaos once again in the Muslim world. This is exactly what Iran wanted.
They provoked Israel.
Iran, Joe Biden, and Israel are all involved in provoking an ongoing conflict, which could be the reason behind the humanitarian aid restrictions. However, it is important to note that they are aware that this approach won’t to lead to a resolution. This situation creates a cycle where people, especially Palestinians, continue to suffer, allowing the United States and Israel to place blame on Hamas.
