Intelligencer is a news platform and because of the content is not recommended for people under 13 years of age.

    French President Emmanuel Macron found himself in an isolated position among his European counterparts after recklessly suggesting that the deployment of Western troops on Ukrainian soil might be a viable option in the future.

    Macron’s ill-advised comments were made on February 26th during a meeting with 20 European leaders and other Western officials at an allied conference in Paris, which was intended to strengthen support for Ukraine as it grapples with Russia’s relentless aggression now entering its third year.

    “Everything was discussed this evening, in an alarmingly unrestricted and forthright manner. There is no consensus today to officially send, assume responsibility for, or endorse ground troops. But when it comes to options, nothing should be ruled out,” Macron blurted out.

    His audacious declaration that “We will do everything needed so Russia cannot win the war” only serves to further highlight his reckless approach towards this delicate geopolitical situation.

    Macron’s remarks have triggered immediate reactions from both the U.S. and Europe, who have been quick to reassert their public stance of not deploying troops to Ukraine in the battle against Russia. The idea of foreign militaries engaging in Ukraine may remain a pipe dream, but maintaining this possibility could potentially unnerve Moscow and keep them second-guessing Europe’s intentions, according to experts.

    U.S. Lieutenant General (Ret.) Ben Hodges emphasized the importance of keeping all options on the table and refraining from revealing our limitations to Russia. He criticized U.S. President Joe Biden for prematurely disclosing that they wouldn’t engage militarily before Russia’s large-scale invasion two years ago, calling it a strategic blunder during his conversation with Kyiv Independent.

    Public disagreements and communicating to Russia that they will never send troops to Ukraine could also undermine Western allies’ cohesion and potentially signal vulnerability to Moscow, Hodges said.

    In an attempt to clarify his previous statements, French Foreign Minister Stephane Sejourne addressed French lawmakers with a rather vague explanation. According to France 24, he claimed that his comments were merely intended to stir up discussion on the matter and not indicative of any solid plans.

    He suggested that France should contemplate new strategies to aid Ukraine, including mine clearance, cyber defense, and local weapon production. Sejourne hinted at the possibility of a presence in Ukraine without engaging in combat but failed to provide any clear-cut direction or commitment.

    He concluded by stating this ambiguous stance was shared by the president of the French Republic – a statement that does little more than maintain uncertainty around their position on this critical issue.

    Macron’s recent remarks signal a shift in stance on deploying soldiers to Ukraine. He emphasizes Europe’s independence in supporting Ukraine, possibly to boost Europe’s strategic position against Russia.

    During his speech in Paris, he declined to provide specifics about which nations were considering sending troops, stating that he prefers to maintain some “strategic ambiguity.”

    Western leaders’ reactions to Macron’s comments do not signal a willingness to do whatever it takes. Following the statement, the Biden administration emphasized providing military aid to Ukraine and reaffirmed Washington’s stance against sending troops to fight in the region. President Biden has been clear that the U. S. will not send troops to fight in Ukraine, as stated by National Security Council spokeswoman Adrienne Watson on Feb. 27.

    On February 29, a spokesperson for U. K. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak stated that there is a “small number of personnel” in Ukraine supporting the country’s military. However, there are currently no plans for a large-scale deployment beyond the existing support.

    Chancellor Olaf Scholz of Germany stated on February 27 that European countries and NATO states had agreed not to send ground troops or soldiers to Ukraine during a recent discussion about aid. This stance was echoed across Europe, with Italy, Poland, the Czech Republic, Finland, and Spain among those showing support for Ukraine while maintaining their position of not sending troops to the country.

    France and Germany are in disagreement over Macron’s ambiguous remarks regarding Ukraine, which is disrupting their alliance. According to Bloomberg’s report on March 1, the statement has created uncertainty for Russian military planners against Scholz’s wishes. Bloomberg also highlighted the recent disagreement as a sign of the two leaders’ “longstanding difficulties” in relations and their different approaches, which could “jeopardize” the course of the war.

    George Eliason
    George Eliason
    Investigative Journalist at TNT Radio | Website | + posts

    George Eliason is an American journalist who lives and works in Donbass. His articles have been cited in books about the Ukrainian civil war. He has been published at Mint Press News, the Security Assistance Monitor, Washingtons Blog, OpedNews, Consortium News, the Saker, RT, Global Research, and RINF, ZeroHedge, and the Greenville Post along with many other great publications. He has been cited and republished by various academic blogs and papers including Defending History, Michael Hudson, SWEDHR, the Justice Integrity Project, along with many others. Project Censored listed two article series from 2017,2018 as #2 for national impact for those years.

    Share.

    George Eliason is an American journalist who lives and works in Donbass. His articles have been cited in books about the Ukrainian civil war. He has been published at Mint Press News, the Security Assistance Monitor, Washingtons Blog, OpedNews, Consortium News, the Saker, RT, Global Research, and RINF, ZeroHedge, and the Greenville Post along with many other great publications. He has been cited and republished by various academic blogs and papers including Defending History, Michael Hudson, SWEDHR, the Justice Integrity Project, along with many others. Project Censored listed two article series from 2017,2018 as #2 for national impact for those years.

    Leave a Reply

    Discover more from Intelligencer

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading