The conflict between Israel and Hamas is not as straightforward as it seems. It is crucial to understand that Hamas emerged as a response to the oppressive situation imposed on Palestinians by Israel. This context sheds light on the complexities of the situation and encourages a more nuanced approach to resolving the conflict.
There was no Hamas before 1987. Hamas as a group was born out of Israeli opposition, which is why Hamas’s entire objective is to destroy Israel.
They were born out of opposition to Israeli oppression, and now their goal is to fight against the oppressors who essentially gave rise to their organization. It’s important to understand that Hamas exists solely within Palestine, which is located within what is commonly referred to as Israel.
Palestine is not an arbitrary term; it represents the desire to establish a state within the landmass commonly known as Israel. Similarly, Hamas is not a random term either.
Hamas is not internationally recognized as a terrorist group. It is considered a legitimate political party within Gaza, where it holds power through legislative elections. It governs Gaza in a manner that is not authoritarian.
In fact, a significant number of Palestinians and Muslims inside Israel support Hamas. The classification of Hamas as a terrorist organization is predominantly an American perspective.
Interestingly, even the UN does not categorize Hamas as a terrorist group; instead, they recognize it as a political organization and a political force. Therefore, when the president refers to Hamas as a terrorist group, it reflects a distinctively American viewpoint.
People often fail to understand that Hamas emerged as a response to Israel’s aggression against Palestinians. It is crucial to maintain objectivity when analyzing historical events, rather than solely focusing on current occurrences.
The president of the United States has allocated $100 million in humanitarian aid for Palestine. Additionally, the president is urging the US Congress to allocate $100 billion from taxpayer funds to support Israel, Ukraine, and Taiwan.
There are significant financial commitments being made, but the question remains whether humanitarian aid will effectively reach those in need in Palestine. Additionally, there is concern about the allocation of $100 billion for three potential wars.
The president’s request to prevent Hamas from interfering with humanitarian aid in Gaza is unreasonable because Hamas is the governing body in that region.
Providing humanitarian aid to Gaza without involving Hamas is impossible. This condition may lead to an expected response, as it allows Israel and the United States to claim that Hamas interfered with the aid efforts in the future.
This conflict against Hamas and the Palestinians is going to be further fueled. It appears that either he or his advisors are setting this up, and the outcome seems very predictable.
The current situation involving Hamas and Israel can be seen as a game of provocation, with Iran supporting Hamas’ actions. Iran’s objective seems to be provoking Israel and creating a humanitarian crisis, which has disrupted the progress in Israeli-Saudi Arabian ties.
Israel has been making significant progress in establishing closer ties with Sunni Muslim nations such as the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Bahrain. These developments were seen as transformative for peace in the Middle East.
However, Iran sought to disrupt this growing cooperation and funded the recent attack launched by Hamas into Israel. As a result, the Muslim world is once again experiencing turmoil, which aligns with Iran’s intentions.
Israel was provoked, and now the United States and Israel are seeking to further escalate the conflict. This is likely the reason behind the imposition of humanitarian aid restrictions. However, it is important to note that they are aware that this approach will not lead to a resolution.
Consequently, the suffering of the Palestinian people will persist, allowing the United States and Israel to continually blame Hamas.
